TEI models for the publication of SSH journals: opportunities, challenges, and firsts steps towards a standardized workflow
TEI models for the publication of SSH journals: opportunities, challenges, and firsts steps towards a standardized workflow
Submission for Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative - Issue 14; The TEI Guidelines are developed and curated by a community whose main purpose is to standardize the encoding of primary sources relevant for Humanities research and teaching. But there are other communities working with TEI-based publication formats. The first goal of this paper is to raise awareness for the importance of TEI-based scholarly publishing as we know it today. The second goal is to contribute to a reflection on the development of a TEI customization that would cover the whole authoring-reviewing-publishing workflow and guarantee archiving options as solid for journal publications as we now have them for primary sources published in TEI.
- Université Paris Diderot France
digital publications, workflow, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, TEI model, scholarly publishing, humanités numériques, OJS, schemas
digital publications, workflow, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, TEI model, scholarly publishing, humanités numériques, OJS, schemas
Martin Holmes, Laurent Romary. Encoding models for scholarly literature.Publishing and digital libraries: Legal and organizational issues, dir. Ioannis Iglezakis, TatianaEleni Synodinou, Sarantos Kapidakis. IGI Global, 2010, ⟨10.4018/978-1-60960-031- 0⟩. ⟨hal-00390966v2⟩ ChristineKosmopoulos, Denise Pumain. Révolution numérique et évaluation bibliométrique dans les sciences humaines et sociales. Revue européenne des sciences sociales [Online], XLVI-141 | 2008, Online since 01 May 2011, connection on 19 December 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ress/151; DOI : 10.4000/ress.151 Klaus Thoden. Modeling scholarly publications for sustainable workflows.ELPUB 2019 23rd edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Jun 2019, Marseille, France. ⟨10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.2⟩. ⟨hal-02143240⟩ [OpenAIRE]
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!- Université Paris Diderot France
Submission for Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative - Issue 14; The TEI Guidelines are developed and curated by a community whose main purpose is to standardize the encoding of primary sources relevant for Humanities research and teaching. But there are other communities working with TEI-based publication formats. The first goal of this paper is to raise awareness for the importance of TEI-based scholarly publishing as we know it today. The second goal is to contribute to a reflection on the development of a TEI customization that would cover the whole authoring-reviewing-publishing workflow and guarantee archiving options as solid for journal publications as we now have them for primary sources published in TEI.