Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Multilingual Evaluation Dataset for Monolingual Word Sense Alignment

Authors: Ahmadi, Sina; McCrae, John P.; Nimb, Sanni; Troelsgård, Thomas; Olsen, Sussi; Pedersen, Bolette S.; Declerck, Thierry; +37 Authors

A Multilingual Evaluation Dataset for Monolingual Word Sense Alignment

Abstract

Aligning senses across resources and languages is a challenging task with beneficial applications in the field of natural language processing and electronic lexicography. In this paper, we describe our efforts in manually aligning monolingual dictionaries. The alignment is carried out at sense-level for various resources in 15 languages. Moreover, senses are annotated with possible semantic relationships such as broadness, narrowness, relatedness, and equivalence. In comparison to previous datasets for this task, this dataset covers a wide range of languages and resources and focuses on the more challenging task of linking general-purpose language. We believe that our data will pave the way for further advances in alignment and evaluation of word senses by creating new solutions, particularly those notoriously requiring data such as neural networks. Our resources are publicly available at https://github.com/elexis-eu/MWSA.

82 references, page 1 of 9

Ahmadi, S., Arcan, M., and McCrae, J. (2018). On lexicographical networks. In Workshop on eLexicography: Between Digital Humanities and Artificial Intelligence. [OpenAIRE]

Burgun, A. and Bodenreider, O. (2001). Comparing terms, concepts and semantic classes in WordNet and the Unified Medical Language System. In in WordNet and the Unified Medical Language System. Proc NAACL Workshop, WordNet and Other Lexical Resources: Applications, Extensions and Customizations, pages 77-82.

Casteleiro, J. M. (2001). Diciona´rio da l´ıngua portuguesa contemporaˆnea. Lisboa: Academia das Cieˆncias de Lisboa e Editorial Verbo, 2.

Cimiano, P., McCrae, J. P., and Buitelaar, P. (2016). Lexicon Model for Ontologies: Community Report.

Dahlerup, V. (1918). Ordbog over det danske sprog, volume 1. Gyldendal.

Dandala, B., Mihalcea, R., and Bunescu, R. (2013). Word sense disambiguation using Wikipedia. In The People's Web Meets NLP, pages 241-262. Springer. [OpenAIRE]

Do´naill, N. O. and Maoileoin, P. U. (1991). An Foclo´ir Beag. An Gum.

Erjavec, T. and Fiser, D. (2006). Building Slovene WordNet. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1678-1683.

A. P. Evgenyeva, editor. (1999). Dictionary of the Russian Language, volume 1-4. Russkiy yazyk.

Ken Farø, et al., editors. (2003). Den danske ordbog, bd. 1-6, volume 1-6. Gyldendal. https://ordnet.dk/ddo en.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
Average
Average
Average
Funded by
EC| ELEXIS
Project
ELEXIS
European Lexicographic Infrastructure
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 731015
  • Funding stream: H2020 | RIA
Related to Research communities
DARIAH EU
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.