Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Sustainabilityarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Sustainability
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Digitalization, Participation and Interaction: Towards More Inclusive Tools in Urban Design—A Literature Review

Authors: Gustavo De Siqueira; Sadmira Malaj; Mayssa Hamdani;

Digitalization, Participation and Interaction: Towards More Inclusive Tools in Urban Design—A Literature Review

Abstract

The 11th sustainable development goal highlights the importance of making our cities more inclusive. For that, planning processes should become more engaging and empower citizens to actively participate in designing their environments. However, the COVID-19 crisis exposed inequalities and posed challenges to communal activities due to restrictions on face-to-face activities. These constraints brought many researchers and practitioners to rethink the process of co-designing workshops, putting digitalization in the spotlight. The present study consists of a systematic literature review focusing on understanding how digital technologies affect participatory approaches in urban design and how they have evolved since the 1990s. Also, it investigates the correlation between levels of participation and interaction in different types of collaborative design workshops held in communities. We found that many authors have been developing new methodologies and digital tools aiming to digitalize the co-designing experience through mediation. However, there is no evolutionary evidence of tools in the field creating bridges between digitalization, participation, and interaction. We argue that a research agenda is required to produce more sophisticated tools to tackle social barriers and support inclusive design towards sustainable urban development patterns.

Keywords

Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geography, Planning and Development, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

57 references, page 1 of 6

1. 2. 3. Golden, E.A.; Zweig, M.; Danieletto, M.; Landell, K.; Nadkarni, G.; Bottinger, E.; Katz, L.; Somarriba, R.; Sharma, V.; Katz, C.L.; et al. A Resilience-Building App to Support the Mental Health of Health Care Workers in the COVID-19 Era: Design Process, Distribution, and Evaluation (Preprint). JMIR Form. Res. 2021, 5, e26590. [CrossRef] [PubMed] FAB at CHI: Digital Fabrication Tools, Design, and Community. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 27 April-2 May 2013; Volume 2013, pp. 3307-3310. [CrossRef] Zamenopoulos, T.; Lam, B.; Alexiou, K.; Kelemen, M.; De Sousa, S.; Moffat, S.; Phillips, M. Types, obstacles and sources of empowerment in co-design: The role of shared material objects and processes. CoDesign 2019, 17, 139-158. [CrossRef] Arnstein, S.R. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 1969, 35, 216-224. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]

5. Davis, A.; Wallace, N.; Langley, J.; Gwilt, I. Low-contact co-design: Considering more flexible spatiotemporal models for the co-design workshop. Strateg. Des. Res. J. 2021, 14, 124-137. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]

6. De Siqueira, G.; Al Balushi, A. Co-designing the pedestrian revolution in Muscat. City Territ. Arch. 2020, 7, 11. [CrossRef]

7. Jacobs, J.; Brandt, J.; Mellis, D.; Tanenbaum, J.; Zoran, A.; Torres, C. Digital Craftsmanship: HCI Takes on Technology as an Expressive Medium. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 4-8 June 2016; pp. 57-60. [CrossRef]

8. Larkey, L.; Del Toro-Mejías, L.; DiFulvio, G.; Gubrium, A. Narrative Influences on 'Desire to Act in My Community' in Digital Storytelling Workshops for Latina Teens. Int. Q. Community Health Educ. 2018, 38, 163-167. [CrossRef]

9. Gray, J.; Rumpe, B. Models as the subject of research. Softw. Syst. Model. 2019, 18, 3189-3191. [CrossRef]

10. Hatton, A.L.; Haslam, C.; Bell, S.; Langley, J.; Woolrych, R.; Cory, C.; Brownjohn, J.M.W.; Goodwin, V.A. Innovative solutions to enhance safe and green environments for ageing well using co-design through patient and public involvement. Res. Involv. Engagem. 2020, 6, 45. [CrossRef]

11. Widzisz-pronobis, S. Involving Public Space Users to Design Changes Based on the Redevelopment of the Square in Gorzów Wielkopolski (Poland). Case Study. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 2019, 12, 41-51. [CrossRef]

12. Münster, S.; Georgi, C.; Heijne, K.; Klamert, K.; Noennig, J.R.; Pump, M.; Stelzle, B.; der Meer, H. How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017, 112, 2391-2405. [CrossRef] [OpenAIRE]

13. Eric, D.; Refined, S. Organize Three International DARIAH Workshops; no. 731081; Desir: Paris, France, 2020; pp. 1-37.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
gold
Funded by
EC| DESIR
Project
DESIR
DARIAH ERIC Sustainability Refined
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 731081
  • Funding stream: H2020 | CSA
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.