You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation
Copyright policy )Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation
The digital format opens up new possibilities for interaction with monographic publications. In particular, annotation tools make it possible to broaden the discussion on the content of a book, to suggest new ideas, to report errors or inaccuracies, and to conduct open peer reviews. However, this requires the support of the users who might not yet be familiar with the annotation of digital documents. This paper will give concrete examples and recommendations for exploiting the potential of annotation in academic research and teaching. After presenting the annotation tool of Hypothesis, the article focuses on its use in the context of HIRMEOS (High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science Infrastructure), a project aimed to improve the Open Access digital monograph. The general line and the aims of a post-peer review experiment with the annotation tool, as well as its usage in didactic activities concerning monographic publications are presented and proposed as potential best practices for similar annotation activities.
- University of Göttingen Germany
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Open science Higher education Computer science Best practice media_common.quotation_subject Context (language use) World Wide Web Annotation Conversation Open peer review media_common business.industry business
Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Communication. Mass media lcsh:Information resources (General) lcsh:P87-96 lcsh:ZA3040-5185
open annotation; monographs; open access; higher education; open peer review, Library and Information Sciences, open annotation, Media Technology, Business and International Management, open access, 020, Communication, monographs, Computer Science Applications, open peer review, higher education
open annotation; monographs; open access; higher education; open peer review, Library and Information Sciences, open annotation, Media Technology, Business and International Management, open access, 020, Communication, monographs, Computer Science Applications, open peer review, higher education
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Open science Higher education Computer science Best practice media_common.quotation_subject Context (language use) World Wide Web Annotation Conversation Open peer review media_common business.industry business
Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Communication. Mass media lcsh:Information resources (General) lcsh:P87-96 lcsh:ZA3040-5185
Arbesman, S. The Network Structure of Jewish Texts. Wired. 10 July 2014. Available online: https: //www.wired.com/2014/07/the-network-structure-of-jewish-texts/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).
2001. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105065190101500304 (accessed on 3 May 2019). [CrossRef] Bush, V. As We May Think. The Atlantic. 1945. Available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).
Andreessen, M. Why Andreessen Horowitz is Investing in Rap Genius. Genius Blog. Available online: https: //genius.com/Marc-andreessen-why-andreessen-horowitz-is-investing-in-rap-genius-annotated (accessed on 2 May 2019).
W3C. Three Recommendations to Enable Annotations on the Web. W3C Blog. 23 February 2017. Available online: https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/6156 (accessed on 2 May 2019).
NCBI Insights. PubMedCommons to be Discontinued. 2018. Available online: https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/2018/02/01/pubmed-commons-to-be-discontinued/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).
Mod, C. The Future Book is Here, But It's Not What We Expected. Wired. 20 December 2018. Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/future-book-is-here-but-not-what-we-expected/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).
Wolfe, J. Annotations and the collaborative digital library: E ects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 2008, 3, 141-164.
Available online: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01981922 (accessed on 2 May 2019).
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).3 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 10% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!- University of Göttingen Germany
The digital format opens up new possibilities for interaction with monographic publications. In particular, annotation tools make it possible to broaden the discussion on the content of a book, to suggest new ideas, to report errors or inaccuracies, and to conduct open peer reviews. However, this requires the support of the users who might not yet be familiar with the annotation of digital documents. This paper will give concrete examples and recommendations for exploiting the potential of annotation in academic research and teaching. After presenting the annotation tool of Hypothesis, the article focuses on its use in the context of HIRMEOS (High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science Infrastructure), a project aimed to improve the Open Access digital monograph. The general line and the aims of a post-peer review experiment with the annotation tool, as well as its usage in didactic activities concerning monographic publications are presented and proposed as potential best practices for similar annotation activities.