Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Publicationsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Publications
Article
License: cc-by
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Publications
Article . 2019
Data sources: DOAJ-Articles
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation

Authors: Andrea C. Bertino; Heather Staines;

Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation

Abstract

The digital format opens up new possibilities for interaction with monographic publications. In particular, annotation tools make it possible to broaden the discussion on the content of a book, to suggest new ideas, to report errors or inaccuracies, and to conduct open peer reviews. However, this requires the support of the users who might not yet be familiar with the annotation of digital documents. This paper will give concrete examples and recommendations for exploiting the potential of annotation in academic research and teaching. After presenting the annotation tool of Hypothesis, the article focuses on its use in the context of HIRMEOS (High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science Infrastructure), a project aimed to improve the Open Access digital monograph. The general line and the aims of a post-peer review experiment with the annotation tool, as well as its usage in didactic activities concerning monographic publications are presented and proposed as potential best practices for similar annotation activities.

Country
Germany
Related Organizations
Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Open science Higher education Computer science Best practice media_common.quotation_subject Context (language use) World Wide Web Annotation Conversation Open peer review media_common business.industry business

Library of Congress Subject Headings: lcsh:Communication. Mass media lcsh:Information resources (General) lcsh:P87-96 lcsh:ZA3040-5185

Keywords

open annotation; monographs; open access; higher education; open peer review, Library and Information Sciences, open annotation, Media Technology, Business and International Management, open access, 020, Communication, monographs, Computer Science Applications, open peer review, higher education

Arbesman, S. The Network Structure of Jewish Texts. Wired. 10 July 2014. Available online: https: //www.wired.com/2014/07/the-network-structure-of-jewish-texts/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).

2001. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105065190101500304 (accessed on 3 May 2019). [CrossRef] Bush, V. As We May Think. The Atlantic. 1945. Available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).

Andreessen, M. Why Andreessen Horowitz is Investing in Rap Genius. Genius Blog. Available online: https: //genius.com/Marc-andreessen-why-andreessen-horowitz-is-investing-in-rap-genius-annotated (accessed on 2 May 2019).

W3C. Three Recommendations to Enable Annotations on the Web. W3C Blog. 23 February 2017. Available online: https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/6156 (accessed on 2 May 2019).

NCBI Insights. PubMedCommons to be Discontinued. 2018. Available online: https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.

nih.gov/2018/02/01/pubmed-commons-to-be-discontinued/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).

Mod, C. The Future Book is Here, But It's Not What We Expected. Wired. 20 December 2018. Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/future-book-is-here-but-not-what-we-expected/ (accessed on 2 May 2019).

Wolfe, J. Annotations and the collaborative digital library: E ects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 2008, 3, 141-164.

Available online: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01981922 (accessed on 2 May 2019).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Funded by
EC| HIRMEOS
Project
HIRMEOS
High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science infrastructure
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 731102
  • Funding stream: H2020 | RIA
Related to Research communities
DARIAH EU
moresidebar

Do the share buttons not appear? Please make sure, any blocking addon is disabled, and then reload the page.