publication . Article . 2019

A Case Report: Building communities with training and resources for Open Science trainers

Brinken, Helene; Kuchma, Iryna; Kalaitzi, Vaso; Davidson, Joy; Pontika, Nancy; Cancellieri, Matteo; Correia, Antonia; Carvalho, Jose; Melero, Reme; Kastelic, Damjana; ...
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Oct 2019
Abstract
To foster responsible research and innovation, research communities, institutions, and funders are shifting their practices and requirements towards Open Science. Open Science skills are becoming increasingly essential for researchers. Indeed general awareness of Open Science has grown among EU researchers, but the practical adoption can be further improved. Recognizing a gap between the needed and the provided training offer, the FOSTER project offers practical guidance and training to help researchers learn how to open up their research within a particular domain or research environment. Aiming for a sustainable approach, FOSTER focused on strengthening the Open Science training capacity by establishing and supporting a community of trainers. The creation of an Open Science training handbook was a first step towards bringing together trainers to share their experiences and to create an open and living knowledge resource. A subsequent series of train-the-trainer bootcamps helped trainers to find inspiration, improve their skills and to intensify exchange within a peer group. Four trainers, who attended one of the bootcamps, contributed a case study on their experiences and how they rolled out Open Science training within their own institutions. On its platform the project provides a range of online courses and resources to learn about key Open Science topics. FOSTER awards users gamification badges when completing courses in order to provide incentives and rewards, and to spur them on to even greater achievements in learning. The paper at hand describes FOSTER Plus’ training strategies, shares the lessons learnt and provides guidance on how to re-use the project’s materials and training approaches.
Peer reviewed
Persistent Identifiers
Fields of Science and Technology classification (FOS)
03 medical and health sciences, 0301 basic medicine, 0302 clinical medicine, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, 030304 developmental biology
Subjects
free text keywords: open science; training; bootcamp; handbook; book sprint; online-courses, 020, online-courses, book sprint, handbook, bootcamp, training, open science, Bibliography. Library science. Information resources, Z, Library and Information Sciences, Order (exchange), Reuse, Research environment, Open science, Incentive, Public relations, business.industry, business, Training (civil), Responsible Research and Innovation, Sociology, Peer group
Communities
  • DARIAH EU
Funded by
EC| FOSTER Plus
Project
FOSTER Plus
Fostering the practical implementation of Open Science in Horizon 2020 and beyond
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 741839
  • Funding stream: H2020 | CSA
18 references, page 1 of 2

Baker, M. (2015). Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies. Nature, 521, 274-276. https://doi.org/10.1038/521274a.

Begley, C.G., & Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2015). Reproducibility in science. Circulation Research, 116(1), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819.

McDowell, G.S., Gunsalus, K.T.W., MacKellar, D.C., Mazzilli, S.A., Pai, V.P., Goodwin, P.R., … Polka, J.K. (2014). Shaping the future of research: A perspective from junior scientists. F1000Research, 3(291), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.12688%2Ff1000research.5878.1.

Munafò, M.R., Nosek, B.A., Bishop, D.V.M., Button, K.S., Chambers, C.D., Percie du Sert, N., … Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0021, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021. [OpenAIRE]

Nosek, B.A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45, 137-141. https://doi. [OpenAIRE]

org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192.

O'Carroll, C., Kamerlin, C.L., Brennan, N., Hyllseth, B., Kohl, U., O'Neill, G., & Van Den Berg, R. (2017). Providing researchers with the skills and competencies they need to practise Open Science. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

https://doi.org/10.2777/121253.

Pontika, N., Knoth, P., Cancellieri, M., & Pearce, S. (2015). Fostering open science to research using a taxonomy and an elearning portal. In: iKnow '15: 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data Driven Business, Article no. 11. Graz, Austria: ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571. [OpenAIRE]

Ross, Z., Wickham, H., & Robinson, D. (2017). Declutter your R workflow with tidy tools.

PeerJ Preprints, 5(e3180v1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3180v1.

Toelch, U., & Ostwald, D. (2018). Digital open science-Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research. PLOS Biology, 16(7):e2006022, 1-11. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006022. [OpenAIRE]

Waring, M.J., Arrowsmith, J., Leach, A.R., Leeson, P.D., Mandrell, S., Owen, R.M., … Weir, A. (2015). An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 14, 475-486. https://doi.

org/10.1038/nrd4609.

Weissgerber, T.L., Garovic, V.D., Winham, S.J., Milic, N.M., & Prager, E.M. (2016).

18 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue