Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODO; Teksty Drugi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO; Teksty Drugie
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO; Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Teksty Drugie
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
OpenEdition
Article . 2019
Data sources: OpenEdition
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Kim są polscy humaniści cyfrowi?

Authors: Maryl, Maciej;

Kim są polscy humaniści cyfrowi?

Abstract

Autor przybliża sylwetkę polskich humanistów cyfrowych na podstawie wyników europejskiego sondażu praktyk oraz potrzeb cyfrowych w humanistyce i naukach o sztuce przeprowadzonego na przełomie 2014 i 2015 roku przez Obserwatorium Cyfrowych Metod i Praktyk (Digital Methods and Practices Observatory – DiMPO) – grupę roboczą europejskiego konsorcjum DARIAH. Wyniki analizowane są w kontekście obecnej w literaturze przedmiotu koncepcji o falach humanistyki cyfrowej: pierwsza to prosta digitalizacji, druga – zastosowanie zaawansowanych metod cyfrowych, trzecia – krytyczny namysł nad epistemologią cyfrowych instrumentów. Autor proponuje stopniowalne definiowanie humanistów cyfrowych przez umieszczanie ich na spektrum, od tych korzystających z podstawowych narzędzi po najbardziej zaawansowanych użytkowników. To sketch a profile of Polish digital humanists, Maryl draws on the results of a European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities. This survey was conducted in 2014 and 2015 by the Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), a working group of the European consortium DARIAH. The results are analysed in the context of the concept of waves of digital humanities: the first wave is simple digitization, the second entails the use of advanced digital methods, the third harnesses critical reflection on the epistemology of digital instruments. Maryl proposes to classify digital humanists by placing them on different points on a spectrum, from those using basic tools to the most advanced users.

Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Physics Theology

Keywords

DiMPO, Literature and Literary Theory, methodology, humanistyka cyfrowa, digitalizacja, digitalization, survey, Digital Methods and Practices Observatory, digitalisation, Obserwatorium Cyfrowych Metod i Praktyk (Digital Methods and Practices Observatory – DiMPO), digital humanities, DARIAH

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 186
    download downloads 146
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
  • 186
    views
    146
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
3
Average
Average
Average
186
146
bronze