You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
The OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard: On Blending Scientific Workflows and Scientific Publishing
Despite the hype, the effective implementation of Open Science is hindered by several cultural and technical barriers. Researchers embraced digital science, use “digital laboratories” (e.g. research infrastructures, thematic services) to conduct their research and publish research data, but practices and tools are still far from achieving the expectations of transparency and reproducibility of Open Science. The places where science is performed and the places where science is published are still regarded as different realms. Publishing is still a post-experimental, tedious, manual process, too often limited to articles, in some contexts semantically linked to datasets, rarely to software, generally disregarding digital representations of experiments. In this work we present the OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard (RCD), designed to overcome some of these barriers for a given research community, minimizing the technical efforts and without renouncing any of the community services or practices. The RCD flanks digital laboratories of research communities with scholarly communication tools for discovering and publishing interlinked scientific products such as literature, datasets, and software. The benefits of the RCD are show-cased by means of two real-case scenarios: the European Marine Science community and the European Plate Observing System (EPOS) research infrastructure.
This work is partly funded by the OpenAIRE-Advance H2020 project (grant number: 777541; call: H2020-EINFRA-2017) and the OpenAIREConnect H2020 project (grant number: 731011; call: H2020-EINFRA-2016-1). Moreover, we would like to thank our colleagues Michele Manunta, Francesco Casu, and Claudio De Luca (Institute for the Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, CNR, Italy) for their work on the EPOS infrastructure RCD; and Stephane Pesant (University of Bremen, Germany) his work on the European Marine Science RCD.
First Online 30 August 2019
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Workflow Publishing business.industry business Computer science Scholarly communication Open science Transparency (behavior) Dashboard (business) Process (engineering) Publication Data science
Open science, Research communities, Research infrastructures, Scholarly communication, Science & Technology, Open science, Research communities, Research infrastructures, Scholarly communication
Open science, Research communities, Research infrastructures, Scholarly communication, Science & Technology, Open science, Research communities, Research infrastructures, Scholarly communication
Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Workflow Publishing business.industry business Computer science Scholarly communication Open science Transparency (behavior) Dashboard (business) Process (engineering) Publication Data science
1412
1. Artini, M., Atzori, C., Bardi, A., La Bruzzo, S., Manghi, P., Mannocci, A.: The openaire literature broker service for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine 21(11/12), 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1045/november2015-artini
2. Atzori, C., Manghi, P., Bardi, A.: Gdup: De-duplication of scholarly communication big graphs. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Conference on Big Data Computing Applications and Technologies (BDCAT). pp. 142{151. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/BDCAT.2018.00025
3. Barker, M., Olabarriaga, S.D., Wilkins-Diehr, N., Gesing, S., Katz, D.S., Shahand, S., Henwood, S., Glatard, T., Je ery, K., Corrie, B., Treloar, A., Glaves, H., Wyborn, L., Hong, N.P.C., Costa, A.: The global impact of science gateways, virtual research environments and virtual laboratories. Future Generation Computer Systems 95, 240 { 248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.12.026
4. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P.: D4Science: an e-Infrastructure for Supporting Virtual Research Environments. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Thanos, C. (eds.) Post-proceedings of the Fifth Italian Research Conference on Digital Libraries - IRCDL 2009, Padova, Italy, 29-30 January 2009. pp. 166{169. DELOS: an Association for Digital Libraries / Department of Information Engineering of the University of Padua (2009), http://www.dei.unipd.it/%7Eagosti/ircdl/atti-ircdl2009- nale.pdf
5. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P.: Virtual research environments: an overview and a research agenda. Data Science Journal 12, GRDI75{GRDI81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.GRDI-013
6. De Roure, D.: The future of scholarly communications. Insights 27(3) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.171 [OpenAIRE]
7. European Commission: Validation of the results of the public consultation on Science 2.0: Science in Transition. Tech. rep., European Commission (2015), http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/science2.0/science 2 0 nal report.pdf
8. European Commission: Open Innovation, Open Science and Open to the World. Tech. rep., European Commission's Directorate-General for Research & Innovation (2016), https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/open-innovationopen-science-open-world-vision-europe
9. Grethe, J.S., Bandrowski, A., Banks, D.E., Condit, C., Gupta, A., Larson, S.D., Li, Y., Ozyurt, I.B., Stagg, A.M., Whetzel, P.L., Marenco, L., Miller, P., Wang, R., Shepherd, G.M., Martone, M.E.: SciCrunch: A cooperative and collaborative data and resource discovery platform for scienti c communities. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics (69) (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fninf.2014.18.00069
10. Je ery, K.G., Meghini, C., Concordia, C., Patkos, T., Brasse, V., Ossenbruck, J.v., Marketakis, Y., Minadakis, N., Marchetti, E.: A reference architecture for virtual research environments. In: Everything Changes, Everything Stays theSame? Understanding Information Spaces. Proceedings of the 15th InternationalSymposium of Information Science (ISI 2017). pp. 76{88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18452/1448 [OpenAIRE]
- 1
- 2
Despite the hype, the effective implementation of Open Science is hindered by several cultural and technical barriers. Researchers embraced digital science, use “digital laboratories” (e.g. research infrastructures, thematic services) to conduct their research and publish research data, but practices and tools are still far from achieving the expectations of transparency and reproducibility of Open Science. The places where science is performed and the places where science is published are still regarded as different realms. Publishing is still a post-experimental, tedious, manual process, too often limited to articles, in some contexts semantically linked to datasets, rarely to software, generally disregarding digital representations of experiments. In this work we present the OpenAIRE Research Community Dashboard (RCD), designed to overcome some of these barriers for a given research community, minimizing the technical efforts and without renouncing any of the community services or practices. The RCD flanks digital laboratories of research communities with scholarly communication tools for discovering and publishing interlinked scientific products such as literature, datasets, and software. The benefits of the RCD are show-cased by means of two real-case scenarios: the European Marine Science community and the European Plate Observing System (EPOS) research infrastructure.
This work is partly funded by the OpenAIRE-Advance H2020 project (grant number: 777541; call: H2020-EINFRA-2017) and the OpenAIREConnect H2020 project (grant number: 731011; call: H2020-EINFRA-2016-1). Moreover, we would like to thank our colleagues Michele Manunta, Francesco Casu, and Claudio De Luca (Institute for the Electromagnetic Sensing of the Environment, CNR, Italy) for their work on the EPOS infrastructure RCD; and Stephane Pesant (University of Bremen, Germany) his work on the European Marine Science RCD.
First Online 30 August 2019