<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

Claim

The Cultural Heritage of Tomorrow: Should we Put a Limit to the Influence that New Technologies Have on Culture and Design?

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Conference object 01 Jan 2018 Italy Firenze University Press

Authors: Gianpiero Alfarano; Erika Lascialfari;

doi: 10.36253/978-88-6453-707-8.18

The Cultural Heritage of Tomorrow: Should we Put a Limit to the Influence that New Technologies Have on Culture and Design?

- Summary
- Subjects
- References
  (5)
- Metrics

Country

Italy

Related Organizations

University of Florence
Italy

Subjects by Vocabulary

Microsoft Academic Graph classification: Cultural heritage Emerging technologies Political science Environmental ethics Limit (mathematics)

Keywords

Cultural Heritage, New Technologies, Culture, Design

1. Tim O'Reilly, “What is web 2.0 - the wisdom of the crowds”, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

2. Dan Bricklin, “The Cornucopia of the Commons: how to get volunteer labor”, http://www.bricklin.com/cornucopia.htm

3. Donald A. Norman , “The Invisible Computer. Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution”, MIT Press, 1998.

4. Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson and John Vlissides with a foreword by Grady Booch, “Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software”, Addison-Wesley, 1994, ISBN: 0-201-63361-2.

5. Martin Fowler , “UML Distilled A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language”, Thoughworks, 1997.

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

BIP!

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average

Related to Research communities

Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage