Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

TEI models for the publication of SSH journals: opportunities, challenges, and firsts steps towards a standardized workflow

Authors: Baillot, Anne; Giovacchini, Julie;

TEI models for the publication of SSH journals: opportunities, challenges, and firsts steps towards a standardized workflow

Abstract

Submission for Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative - Issue 14; The TEI Guidelines are developed and curated by a community whose main purpose is to standardize the encoding of primary sources relevant for Humanities research and teaching. But there are other communities working with TEI-based publication formats. The first goal of this paper is to raise awareness for the importance of TEI-based scholarly publishing as we know it today. The second goal is to contribute to a reflection on the development of a TEI customization that would cover the whole authoring-reviewing-publishing workflow and guarantee archiving options as solid for journal publications as we now have them for primary sources published in TEI.

Country
France
Related Organizations
Keywords

digital publications, workflow, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, TEI model, scholarly publishing, humanités numériques, OJS, schemas

Martin Holmes, Laurent Romary. Encoding models for scholarly literature.Publishing and digital libraries: Legal and organizational issues, dir. Ioannis Iglezakis, TatianaEleni Synodinou, Sarantos Kapidakis. IGI Global, 2010, ⟨10.4018/978-1-60960-031- 0⟩. ⟨hal-00390966v2⟩ ChristineKosmopoulos, Denise Pumain. Révolution numérique et évaluation bibliométrique dans les sciences humaines et sociales. Revue européenne des sciences sociales [Online], XLVI-141 | 2008, Online since 01 May 2011, connection on 19 December 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ress/151; DOI : 10.4000/ress.151 Klaus Thoden. Modeling scholarly publications for sustainable workflows.ELPUB 2019 23rd edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Jun 2019, Marseille, France. ⟨10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.2⟩. ⟨hal-02143240⟩ [OpenAIRE]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average