Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Digitalisierung und ihre Einflüsse auf den Umgang mit alten wie neuen 'Briefen' in deutscher wie internationaler Perspektive

Authors: Baillot, Anne;

Digitalisierung und ihre Einflüsse auf den Umgang mit alten wie neuen 'Briefen' in deutscher wie internationaler Perspektive

Abstract

International audience; Erläutert wird zuerst, was unter dem Begriff "Digitalisierung" in Bezug auf Briefe zu verstehen ist. Im zweiten Teil wird der theoretische Unterbau vorgestellt. Der dritte Teil führt Fallbeispiele aus.

Country
France
Related Organizations
Keywords

Digitalisierung, [SHS.LITT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Literature, OCR, [SHS.LITT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Literature, Briefe, Korrespondenznetzwerke

Baillot, Anne und Busch, Anna (2014). "'Berliner Intellektuelle um 1800' als Programm. Über Potential und Grenzen digitalen Edierens". Romantik digital, literaturkritik Sept. 2014 [http://www.literaturkritik.de/public/rezension.php?rez_id=19678&ausgabe=201409] Beißwenger, Michael (2016). „Praktiken in der internetbasierten Kommunikation“. Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken. Jahrbuch 2015 des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache. Hrsg. v. Arnulf Deppermann, Helmuth Feilke und Angelika Linke. Berlin/New York. 279-310.

Biehl, Theresia, Lorenz, Anne, Osierenski, Dirk (2015). „Exilnetz33. Ein Forschungsportal als Such- und Visualisierungsinstrument“. Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der Digital Humanities (Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften, Sonderband 1.

[http://www.zfdg.de/sb001_011] Bohnenkamp, Anne, Wiethölter, Waltraud (2008). Der Brief - Ereignis und Objekt. Frankfurt a. M.

Bohnenkamp, Anne, Wiethölter, Waltraud (2008). Der Brief - Ereignis und Objekt. Frankfurt Boot, Peter (2011). "Reading Van Gogh Online?". Ariadne Issue 66 [http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue66/boot/] Burghart, Marjorie (2017). “The TEI Critical Apparatus Toolbox: Empowering Textual Scholars through Display, Control, and Comparison Features “. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative [Online], Issue 10 | 2016, Online since 26 December 2016, connection on 07 February 2017. URL: http://jtei.revues.org/1520 ; DOI : 10.4000/jtei.1520 Busch, Anna (2013). „„Verwahre meine Briefe, Briefe sind Archive.“ Julius Eduard Hitzigs Leben und Briefe von Adelbert von Chamisso: Entstehungsgeschichte, Quellenlage, Programm, Rezeption“. Korrespondenzen und Transformationen. Neue Perspektiven auf Adelbert von Chamisso. Hrsg. von Marie-Theres Federhofer und Jutta Weber. Göttingen. 195-216.

Busch, Anna, Görbert, Johannes (2016). „„Rezensiert und zurechtgeknetet.“ Chamissos Briefe von seiner Weltreise - Original und Edition in Gegenüberstellung“. Phantastik und Skepsis. Adelbert von Chamissos Lebens- und Schreibwelten. Hrsg. von Roland Berbig, Walter Erhart, Monika Sproll und Jutta Weber. Göttingen. 111-144.

Gius, Evelyn, Jacke, Janina (2016). Zur Annotation narratologischer Kategorien der Zeit. Guidelines zur Nutzung des CATMA-Tagsets. Version 2. Hamburg. [http://heureclea.de/wpcontent/uploads/2016/11/guidelinesV2.pdf]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
  • citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    Powered byBIP!BIP!
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities