
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Leveraging on the power of expert content curation: the OpenMethods metablog
Leveraging on the power of expert content curation: the OpenMethods metablog
International audience; Navigating through the rich and dynamically evolving (Wouters et al., 2013) Digital Humanities (henceforth DH) landscape can be a time-consuming task and difficult to integrate into researchers' everyday routines. Yet primary goals of the DH paradigm such as 1. broadening and deepening the adoption of digital methods amongst humanities scholars and 2. facilitating the culture of reuse of already existing resources requires sufficient tools that make DH resources, methods and best practices visible, easily discoverable and freely accessible for researchers in all levels of expertise. The OpenMethods metablog aims to fulfil this need and provides a platform to bring together all formats of Open Access publications in different languages about methods in DH to spread the knowledge and raise peer recognition for them.
- UNIVERSITE PARIS DESCARTES France
- Université Paris Diderot France
Scholarly communication, Digital Humanities, Open Access, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, Open Access movement OA movement, [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences
Scholarly communication, Digital Humanities, Open Access, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, Open Access movement OA movement, [SHS.INFO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences
Larsen, P., & von Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 84(3): 575- 603. Publisher Full Text [OpenAIRE]
Rio Riande, G., León, R., Calarco, G., & Striker, G. (eds) (2018). Humanidades Digitales: Construcciones locales en contextos globales. Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Publisher Full Text
Tennant, J. (2016). Breaking the traditional mould of peer review: Why we need a more transparent process of research evaluation. LSE Impact blog. Published: 17.02.2016. Last accessed: 18.06.2018.
Wouters, P., Beaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A., & Wyatt, S. (eds) (2013). Virtual knowledge: Experimenting in the humanities and the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Publisher Full Text [OpenAIRE]
5 Research products, page 1 of 1
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2018IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2020IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
- 2019IsAmongTopNSimilarDocuments
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

International audience; Navigating through the rich and dynamically evolving (Wouters et al., 2013) Digital Humanities (henceforth DH) landscape can be a time-consuming task and difficult to integrate into researchers' everyday routines. Yet primary goals of the DH paradigm such as 1. broadening and deepening the adoption of digital methods amongst humanities scholars and 2. facilitating the culture of reuse of already existing resources requires sufficient tools that make DH resources, methods and best practices visible, easily discoverable and freely accessible for researchers in all levels of expertise. The OpenMethods metablog aims to fulfil this need and provides a platform to bring together all formats of Open Access publications in different languages about methods in DH to spread the knowledge and raise peer recognition for them.