
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Connecting the Humanities through Research Infrastructures
Connecting the Humanities through Research Infrastructures
International audience; Several Research Infrastructures(RIs)exist in the Humanities and Social Sciences, some –such as CLARIN, DARIAH and CESSDA –which address specific areas of interest, i.e. linguistic studies, digital humanities and social science data archives. RIs are also unique in their scope and application, largely tailored to their specific community needs. However, commonalities do exist and it is recognised that benefits are to be gained from these such as efficient use of resources, enabling multi-disciplinary research and sharing good practices. As such,a bridging project PARTHENOS has worked closely with CLARIN and DARIAH as well as ARIADNE (archaeology), CENDARI (history), EHRI (holocaust studies) and E-RIHS (heritage science) to iden-tify, develop and promote these commonalities. In this paper, we present some specif-ic examples of cross-discipline and trans-border applications arising from joint RI collaboration, allowing for entirely new avenues of research
Standards, [INFO.INFO-DL]Computer Science [cs]/Digital Libraries [cs.DL], Language resources, Cross-discipline, Policies, Research Infrastructures
Standards, [INFO.INFO-DL]Computer Science [cs]/Digital Libraries [cs.DL], Language resources, Cross-discipline, Policies, Research Infrastructures
Hinrichs, E., Krauwer, S.: The CLARIN Research Infrastructure: Resources and Tools for eHumanities Scholars. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 1525-1531. European Language Resources Association, Reykjavik (2014). [OpenAIRE]
De Jong, F., Maegaard, B., De Smedt, K., Fišer, D., Van Uytvanck, D.: CLARIN: Towards FAIR and Responsible Data Science Using Language Resources. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 3259-3264. European Language Resources Association, Miyazaki (2018). [OpenAIRE]
1320-1325. European Language Resources Association, Miyazaki (2018).
More information can be found on the PARTHENOS training module Boosting Digital Humanities Research with Parliamentary Data (http://training.parthenos-project.eu/test2/digital-humanities-research-questions-and-methods/researching-parliamentaryrecords-in-the-digital-humanities/boosting-digital-humanities-research-withparliamentary-data/).
Zinn, C.: The CLARIN Language Resource Switchboard. In: Abstracts of the CLARIN Annual Conference 2016, Aix-en-Provence (2016).
Illmayer Klaus and Marie Puren. 'How to work together successfully with eHumanities and e-Heritage Research Infrastructures' (PARTHENOS Webinar). 3rd cycle. PARTHENOS eHumanities and eHeritage Webinar Series, Germany. 2018. [OpenAIRE]
http://training.parthenos-project.eu/sample-page/ehumanities-eheritage-webinarseries/webinar-work-with-research-infrastructures/ (last accessed: 20 September 2018).
For additional background, please see: Laurent Romary, Emiliano Degl'innocenti, Klaus Illmayer, Adeline Joffres, Emilie Kraikamp, et al. Standardization survival kit (Draft). [Research Report] Deliverable 4.1 (2016); Laurent Romary, Piotr Banski, Jack Bowers, Emiliano Degl'innocenti, Matej Ďurčo, et al., Report on Standardization (draft). [Technical Report] Deliverable 4.2 (2017).
Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg and others, 'The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship,' Scientific Data 3 (2016).
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average Powered byBIP!

- Funder: European Commission (EC)
- Project Code: 654119
- Funding stream: H2020 | RIA
International audience; Several Research Infrastructures(RIs)exist in the Humanities and Social Sciences, some –such as CLARIN, DARIAH and CESSDA –which address specific areas of interest, i.e. linguistic studies, digital humanities and social science data archives. RIs are also unique in their scope and application, largely tailored to their specific community needs. However, commonalities do exist and it is recognised that benefits are to be gained from these such as efficient use of resources, enabling multi-disciplinary research and sharing good practices. As such,a bridging project PARTHENOS has worked closely with CLARIN and DARIAH as well as ARIADNE (archaeology), CENDARI (history), EHRI (holocaust studies) and E-RIHS (heritage science) to iden-tify, develop and promote these commonalities. In this paper, we present some specif-ic examples of cross-discipline and trans-border applications arising from joint RI collaboration, allowing for entirely new avenues of research