European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities Digital Methods and Practices Observatory Working Group (DiMPO) Survey highlights EN
European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities Digital Methods and Practices Observatory Working Group (DiMPO) Survey highlights EN
This report summarizes the statistical analysis of the findings of a web-based survey conducted by the Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO), a working group under VCC2 of the DARIAH research infrastructure (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities).In order to provide an evidence-based, up-to-date, and meaningful account of the emerging information practices, needs and attitudes of arts and humanities researchers in the evolving European digital scholarly environment, the web survey involved a transnational team of researchers from more than a dozen countries, and addressed digitally-enabled research practices, attitudes and needs in all areas of Europe and across different arts and humanities disciplines and contexts.
- Aix-Marseille University France
- Université Paris Diderot France
- Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research Croatia
Digital Humanities, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, Practices & Representations, Survey, DARIAH
Digital Humanities, [SHS.INFO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciences, Practices & Representations, Survey, DARIAH
1. Introduction N. Chatzidiakou & C. Dallas 2. Methodology and analysis C. Dallas & N. Chatzidiakou 3. Consolidated findings N. Chatzidiakou & C. Dallas 4. Country profile: Austria G. Schneider & W. Scholger 5. Country profile: Greece N. Chatzidiakou & C. Dallas 6. Country profile: Lithuania I. Kelpšienė 7. Country profile: Poland M. Maryl 8. Country profile: Serbia T. Tasovac & N. Chatzidiakou 9. Country profile: Switzerland B. Immenhauser 10. Comparative findings All authors 11. Conclusions C. Dallas
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!