You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
From artefact typologies to cultural heritage ontologies: or, an account of the lasting impact of archaeological computing
Copyright policy )From artefact typologies to cultural heritage ontologies: or, an account of the lasting impact of archaeological computing
Research in theoretical and computer-based archaeology, from the 1950s onwards, established important perspectives for the formal representation and analysis of tangible cultural entities such as complex artefacts, iconographic compositions and archaeological assemblages, and became a precursor for the emergence of knowledge-based tools, methodologies and standards for artefact-centred information systems in contemporary museums. One particular case in point is CLIO, a semantic information system intended for research use, developed by ICS/FORTH and the Benaki Museum in Greece in the early 1990s, which became a foundation for the definition of the Conceptual Reference Model of the International Documentation Committee of ICOM (CIDOC CRM), recently adopted as the ISO standard for cultural information representation. It is argued here that, as the capabilities of computer applications to provide access to complex, multimedia cultural information increase, so does also the validity and importance of earlier research advances in artefact-centred archaeological computing; and, conversely, that the advent of digital infrastructures for material culture disciplines such as archaeology highlights the pertinence, and potential benefits, of further work on archaeological formal analysis and knowledge representation.
History of applications and research projects, Theoretical and methodological problems
History of applications and research projects, Theoretical and methodological problems
6317
Bearman D. 1996, Overview and discussion points, in Research Agenda for Networked Cultural Heritage, Santa Monica, CA, Getty AHIP, 7-22.
Benardou A. et al. 2009, Understanding the information requirements of arts and humanities scholarship: implications for digital curation, «International Journal of Digital- Cura tion», 2010 (accepted for publication).
Brachman R.J., Levesque H.J. (eds.) 1985, Readings in Knowledge Representation, San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Charniak E., McDermott D. 1985, Introduction to Arti cial Intelligence, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Christoforaki M., Constantopoulos P., Doerr M. 1995, Modelling occurrences in cultural documentation, in P. Moscati (ed.),III International Symposium on Computing and Archaeology (Roma 1995), «Archeologia e Calcolatori», 7, 1996, 22-25.
Clarke D.L. 1968, Analythical Archaeology, London, Methuen.
Constantopoulos P. 1994, Cultural Documentation: The Clio System, Technical Report FORTH - ICS/TR - 115.
Constantopoulos P., Dallas C. 2008, Aspects of a digital curation agenda for cultural heritage, in IEEE International Conference on Distributed Human-Machine Systems (Athens 2008), Prague, Czech Technical University, 317-322.
Constantopoulos P. et al. 2008, Preparing DARIAH, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Systems and MultiMedia (VSMM08), Nicosia, Cyprus (http:// www.dcu.gr/dcu/Documents/documents/preparing-dariah/en/attachment/).
Crofts N., Doerr M., Gill T., Stead S., Stiff M. (eds.) 2009,De nition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (version 5.0.1), ICOM/CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group (http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.1_Mar09.pdf).
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!Research in theoretical and computer-based archaeology, from the 1950s onwards, established important perspectives for the formal representation and analysis of tangible cultural entities such as complex artefacts, iconographic compositions and archaeological assemblages, and became a precursor for the emergence of knowledge-based tools, methodologies and standards for artefact-centred information systems in contemporary museums. One particular case in point is CLIO, a semantic information system intended for research use, developed by ICS/FORTH and the Benaki Museum in Greece in the early 1990s, which became a foundation for the definition of the Conceptual Reference Model of the International Documentation Committee of ICOM (CIDOC CRM), recently adopted as the ISO standard for cultural information representation. It is argued here that, as the capabilities of computer applications to provide access to complex, multimedia cultural information increase, so does also the validity and importance of earlier research advances in artefact-centred archaeological computing; and, conversely, that the advent of digital infrastructures for material culture disciplines such as archaeology highlights the pertinence, and potential benefits, of further work on archaeological formal analysis and knowledge representation.