publication . Other literature type . Article . Preprint . 2019

Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation

Heather Staines; Andrea Bertino;
Open Access
  • Published: 14 May 2019
  • Publisher: MDPI AG
  • Country: Germany
Abstract
<jats:p>The digital format opens up new possibilities for interaction with monographic publications. In particular, annotation tools make it possible to broaden the discussion on the content of a book, to suggest new ideas, to report errors or inaccuracies, and to conduct open peer reviews. However, this requires the support of the users who might not yet be familiar with the annotation of digital documents. This paper will give concrete examples and recommendations for exploiting the potential of annotation in academic research and teaching. After presenting the annotation tool of Hypothesis, the article focuses on its use in the context of HIRMEOS (High Integr...
Subjects
free text keywords: open annotation; monographs; open access; higher education; open peer review, 020, open annotation, monographs, open access, higher education, open peer review, library_information_science, lcsh:Communication. Mass media, lcsh:P87-96, lcsh:Information resources (General), lcsh:ZA3040-5185, Conversation, media_common.quotation_subject, media_common, World Wide Web, Best practice, Annotation, Peer review, Open science, Computer science, business.industry, business
Related Organizations
Funded by
EC| HIRMEOS
Project
HIRMEOS
High Integration of Research Monographs in the European Open Science infrastructure
  • Funder: European Commission (EC)
  • Project Code: 731102
  • Funding stream: H2020 | RIA
Communities
Digital Humanities and Cultural HeritageDH-CH Projects: HIRMEOS
DARIAH EU

Arbesman, S. The Network Structure of Jewish Texts, Wired, 2014, available online: https://www.wired.com/2014/07/the-network-structure-of-jewish-texts/ (accessed on 02-05-2019).

Wolfe, J.L.; Neuwirth, C. M. From the Margins to the Center: The Future of Annotation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2001, available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105065190101500304 (accessed on 03-05-2019).

Bush, V. As We May Think. The Atlantic. 1945, available online: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ (accessed on 02-05- 2019).

Andreessen, M. Why Andreessen Horowitz is Investing in Rap Genius. Genius blog. Available online: https://genius.com/Marc-andreessen-why-andreessen-horowitz-is-investing-in-rap-genius-annotated (accessed on 02-05-2019).

W3C; Three Recommendations to Enable Annotations on the Web. W3C Blog. 23 2017. Available online: https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/6156 (accessed on 02-05-2019) NCBI Insights. PubMedCommons to be Discontinued. 2018. Available online: https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2018/02/01/pubmed-commons-to-be-discontinued/ (accessed on 02- 05-2019).

Mod, C.; The 'Future Book is Here, But It's Not What We Expected. Wired, 2018, available online: https://www.wired.com/story/future-book-is-here-but-not-what-we-expected/ (accessed on 02-05-2019).

Wolfe J. Annotations and the collaborative digital library: Effects of an aligned annotation interface on student argumentation and reading strategies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(2):141-164, June 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-008-9040-x

Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue