Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:
The following results are related to DARIAH EU. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
11 Research products, page 1 of 2

  • DARIAH EU
  • Publications
  • Other research products
  • HAL Paris Nanterre
  • DARIAH EU

10
arrow_drop_down
Relevance
arrow_drop_down
  • English
    Authors: 
    Blandine Nouvel; Evelyne Sinigaglia; Véronique Humbert;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience; The aim of the talk is to present the methodology used to reorganise the PACTOLS thesaurus of Frantiq, launched within the framework of the MASA consortium. PACTOLS is a multilingual and open repository about archaeology from Prehistory to the present and for Classics. It is organized into six micro-thesaurus at the root of its name (Peuples, Anthroponymes,Chronologie, Toponymes, Oeuvres, Lieux, Sujets). The goal is to turn it into a tool interoperable with information systems beyond its original documentary purpose, and usable by archaeologists as a repository for managing scientific data. During the talk, we will describe the choice of tools, the organisation of work within the steering group and the collaborations with specialists for the upgrading and development of the vocabulary while showing the strengths and limitations of some experiments. Above allit will show how the introduction of the conceptual categories of the BackBone Thesaurus of DARIAH, modelled on the CIDOC-CRM ontology, through a progressive deconstruction/reconstruction process, eventually had an impact on all micro thesauri and questioned the organisation of knowledge so far proposed.

  • Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Alliez , Pierre; Dutailly , Bruno; GAUTIER , Hélène; GUIDI , Gabriele; GUILLEM , Anaïs; Joffres , Adeline; Laroche , Florent; Manuel , Adeline; MANZETTI , Maria Cristina; Michel , Alain; +16 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | PARTHENOS (654119)

    International audience; With this White Paper, which gathers contributions from more than 25 experts of 3D imaging, modellng and processing, as well as professionals concerned with the interoperability and sustainability of research data, the PARTHENOS project aims at laying the foundations of a comprehensive environment centered on the researchers' practices concerning 3D digital objects.The topics addressed in the document are meant to help to ensure the development of standardized good practices relating to the production, the handling, the long-term conservation and the reuse of 3D objects. Therefore, even if the focus is put on technical questions (formats, processing, and annotation), the White Paper also identifies the need to clarify the legal status of 3D objects, in order to facilitate their reuse(s) in non-research contexts, in particular in Museums.

  • Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Adeline Joffres; Mike Priddy; Francesca Morselli; Thomas Lebarbé; Xavier Granier; Paul Bertrand; Xavier Rodier; Fabrice Melka; Jason Camlot; Stéfan Sinclair; +17 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience; Knowledge production has always act globally, and when it comes to the humanities early networks of scholars can still be traced in their letter correspondence. With the emergence of digital humanities more prominently in the 1970s, research communities have organized themselves in many different ways. The enthusiasm generated by the promises of what was sometimes perceived as a "new field" were to some extent echoed in new forms of institutionalization, to the point of defining a discipline in its own right. But the enthusiasms was also accompanied by a certain resistance of communities reluctant to introduce digital technology into their field.The term of "digital humanities" in these earlier days of adopting digital methods into the humanities created an area, a niche, inside which pioneers in Digital Humanities could gain critical mass. Today, where digital methods are far more widely applied, one can observe an almost opposite trend, the abandoning of a ‘specific label’ and a much broader advocacy concerning all humanities.What remains specific for DH communities is the close alliance between content providers (which themselves are in a process of digitisation content and access), humanities scholars applying digital methods, and computer scientists linking to new methodological achievements in their field. However, this alliance can express itself in very different forms of national and international organisation, and is far from following a specific model.This panel examines different ways of "forming a community" among digital humanities scholars and scholars in other fields, and other actors in DH. The contributions span a range from generic ways to design digital research infrastructures in the SSH, over national solutions to supranational coordination.The purpose of this panel is to unfold the diversity of the current "digital humanist movement”, not only to compare, but also to understand what is at stake for the actors involved and what impact the different forms of organisation have on creation and evolution of research communities. We further discuss issues of cohesion and durability. Through the papers presented, we will examine the impact of bottom-up, top-down and horizontal strategies as well as the adoption of hybrid solutions (organizational, disciplinary, methodological, scalar) in the design of research communities. This approach will allow us to put convergences and challenges into perspective and to question the re- compositions at work within SSH communities.This panel will highlight the experiences of SSH research communities from different cultures and organizations rooted at different levels of governance, such as some French communities structured around institutional nodes such as Maisons des Sciences de l'Homme (MSH), or research infrastructures at the national (TGIR Huma-Num) or European level (DARIAH ERIC); project based collaboration of research infrastructures (DANS, The Netherlands) and Canada (CRIHN); and professional networks and transnational associations related to digital humanities (e.g. Humanistica, the French-speaking association of digital humanities, or the Latin American network for digital humanities under construction). The comparison of the experiences presented will not produce a homogeneous and smooth image but will highlight differences in approaches and organisation. Even it seems nearly impossible to give account of every association that could be representative on a way to build community in DH, the chair of the session will make an introduction with a brief summary of this landscape. That said, besides the geographical aspect that we try to include, another is that we are giving voice to formal and informal associations such as the LatamHD network, that is just at an early stage and that is not yet defined in its goals. We decided to propose several solutions to deal with the diversity of needs and practises inside our communities and we wanted to present some of them to share our experiences and initiate discussions during this panel in order to develop collaborations with colleagues sharing the same kind of constraints.Thus, the objective is to have a broad discussion with the audience to broaden the perspectives to other experiences.This panel aims to contribute to the reflective work in the wider DH context about factors of constitution, consolidation and evolution of its research communities.

  • Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Baude, Olivier; Joffres, Adeline; Larrousse, Nicolas; Pouyllau, Stéphane;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience

  • Publication . Part of book or chapter of book . Conference object . 2012
    Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Sophie Duchesne; Guillaume Garcia;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: ANR | REANALYSE (ANR-10-BLAN-1813)

    Ce texte rend compte du projet de construction d'une banque d'enquêtes qualitatives mis en œuvre par les auteurs avec l'équipe qualitative du Centre de données sociopolitiques (UMS NRS/Sciences Po). Il relate les tensions entre les logiques patrimoniale et scientifique que combine le projet et prend position pour l'usage scientifique de cet équipement. Il souligne la difficulté de construire un équipement pérenne à une période où la recherche est essentiellement financée par contrat et appel à projets.

  • Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Alès, Catherine; Arena, Richard; Brandt-Grau, Astrid; Chaabane, Naceur; Cortes, Geneviève; Crespin, Renaud; Fretel, Julien; Gardey, Delphine; Guermeur, Ivan; Gueye, Lamine; +11 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
  • English
    Authors: 
    Buddenbohm, Stefan; de Jong, Maaike; Minel, Jean-Luc; Priddy, Mike; Larousse, Nicolas; Moranville, Yoann;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | HaS-DARIAH (675570)

    The Data Deposit Recommendation Service (DDRS) intends to help the user to identify suitable research data repositories depending on case-specific requirements. As an added value service, the DDRS offers the initiation of the ingest and communication process between user and repository by forwarding a deposit request along with a structured description of the research data to the appropriate point of contact.About the nature of this document: This deliverable follows the report "Deliverable 7.1 State of the Art Report on Open Access Research Data for the Humanities" in the Humanities at Scale (HaS) work package 7 “Open Data Infrastructure”. It forms the concept for the "D 7.3 Open Data in the Humanities Platform" and prepares the implementation of the service. The Open Data Platform has been refined to a Data Deposit Recommendation Service (DDRS). The reasoning behind this process and the concept for the service are described in this document.

  • Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Olivier Ertzscheid; gabriel gallezot; Brigitte Simonnot;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    Dans un contexte de sociétés marquées par un procès d'informationnalisation et de circulation croissante et accélérée des flux d'information édités ou non, autant dans la sphère privative, dans celle du travail que dans l'espace public, le web est devenu une source pour les chercheurs en sciences humaines et sociales. La pluralité des formes du web, sa profondeur et sa dimension dynamique exigent une réflexion sur la notion de " documents " notamment lorsqu'il s'agit de constituer des corpus pour les chercheurs. Les auteurs interrogent ces conditions de constitution et de recueil des mémoires observables et de leurs dispositifs d'engrammation, le passage du document aux traces numériques, dans leurs dimensions épistémologiques, pragmatiques, éthiques et sociétales. In our societies marked by a process of informationnalisation and increasing circulation and accelerated flow of information, edited or not, in the private sphere, in the working sphere or in public space, the web has become a source for researchers in the humanities and social sciences. The plurality of forms on the web, its depth and its dynamics require reflection on the concept of "document" especially when it comes to form corpus for researchers. The authors question the conditions for the establishment and collection of observable memories and their engrammation devices, the transition from document to digital traces, in their epistemological, pragmatic, ethical and societal dimensions.

  • Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Stefan Buddenbohm; Maaike A. de Jong; Jean-Luc Minel; Yoann Moranville;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | HaS-DARIAH (675570)

    AbstractHow can researchers identify suitable research data repositories for the deposit of their research data? Which repository matches best the technical and legal requirements of a specific research project? For this end and with a humanities perspective the Data Deposit Recommendation Service (DDRS) has been developed as a prototype. It not only serves as a functional service for selecting humanities research data repositories but it is particularly a technical demonstrator illustrating the potential of re-using an already existing infrastructure - in this case re3data - and the feasibility to set up this kind of service for other research disciplines. The documentation and the code of this project can be found in the DARIAH GitHub repository: https://dariah-eric.github.io/ddrs/.

  • English
    Authors: 
    Stefan Buddenbohm; Cretin, Nathanael; Dijk, Elly; Gaiffe, Bertrand; Jong, Maaike; Le Tellier-Becquart, Nathalie; Minel, Jean-Luc;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | HaS-DARIAH (675570)

    Publishing research data as open data is not yet common practice for researchers in the arts and humanities, and lags behind other scientific fields, such as the natural sciences. Moreover, even when humanities researchers publish their data in repositories and archives, these data are often hard to find and use by other researchers in the field. This report gives an overview of the various aspects that are connected to open access publishing of research data in the humanities. After the introduction, where we give definitions of key concepts, we describe the research data life cycle. We present an overview of the different stakeholders involved and we look into advantages and obstacles for researchers to share research data. Furthermore, a description of the European data repositories is given, followed by certification standards of trusted digital data repositories. The possibility of data citation is important for sharing open data and is also described in this report. We also discuss the standards and use of metadata in the humanities. Finally, we discuss best practice example of open access research data system in the humanities: the French open research data ecosystem. With this report we provide information and guidance on open access publishing of humanities research data for researchers. It will also serve as input for the design and implementation of an open humanities data platform in DARIAH.

Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:
The following results are related to DARIAH EU. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
11 Research products, page 1 of 2
  • English
    Authors: 
    Blandine Nouvel; Evelyne Sinigaglia; Véronique Humbert;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience; The aim of the talk is to present the methodology used to reorganise the PACTOLS thesaurus of Frantiq, launched within the framework of the MASA consortium. PACTOLS is a multilingual and open repository about archaeology from Prehistory to the present and for Classics. It is organized into six micro-thesaurus at the root of its name (Peuples, Anthroponymes,Chronologie, Toponymes, Oeuvres, Lieux, Sujets). The goal is to turn it into a tool interoperable with information systems beyond its original documentary purpose, and usable by archaeologists as a repository for managing scientific data. During the talk, we will describe the choice of tools, the organisation of work within the steering group and the collaborations with specialists for the upgrading and development of the vocabulary while showing the strengths and limitations of some experiments. Above allit will show how the introduction of the conceptual categories of the BackBone Thesaurus of DARIAH, modelled on the CIDOC-CRM ontology, through a progressive deconstruction/reconstruction process, eventually had an impact on all micro thesauri and questioned the organisation of knowledge so far proposed.

  • Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Alliez , Pierre; Dutailly , Bruno; GAUTIER , Hélène; GUIDI , Gabriele; GUILLEM , Anaïs; Joffres , Adeline; Laroche , Florent; Manuel , Adeline; MANZETTI , Maria Cristina; Michel , Alain; +16 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | PARTHENOS (654119)

    International audience; With this White Paper, which gathers contributions from more than 25 experts of 3D imaging, modellng and processing, as well as professionals concerned with the interoperability and sustainability of research data, the PARTHENOS project aims at laying the foundations of a comprehensive environment centered on the researchers' practices concerning 3D digital objects.The topics addressed in the document are meant to help to ensure the development of standardized good practices relating to the production, the handling, the long-term conservation and the reuse of 3D objects. Therefore, even if the focus is put on technical questions (formats, processing, and annotation), the White Paper also identifies the need to clarify the legal status of 3D objects, in order to facilitate their reuse(s) in non-research contexts, in particular in Museums.

  • Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Adeline Joffres; Mike Priddy; Francesca Morselli; Thomas Lebarbé; Xavier Granier; Paul Bertrand; Xavier Rodier; Fabrice Melka; Jason Camlot; Stéfan Sinclair; +17 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience; Knowledge production has always act globally, and when it comes to the humanities early networks of scholars can still be traced in their letter correspondence. With the emergence of digital humanities more prominently in the 1970s, research communities have organized themselves in many different ways. The enthusiasm generated by the promises of what was sometimes perceived as a "new field" were to some extent echoed in new forms of institutionalization, to the point of defining a discipline in its own right. But the enthusiasms was also accompanied by a certain resistance of communities reluctant to introduce digital technology into their field.The term of "digital humanities" in these earlier days of adopting digital methods into the humanities created an area, a niche, inside which pioneers in Digital Humanities could gain critical mass. Today, where digital methods are far more widely applied, one can observe an almost opposite trend, the abandoning of a ‘specific label’ and a much broader advocacy concerning all humanities.What remains specific for DH communities is the close alliance between content providers (which themselves are in a process of digitisation content and access), humanities scholars applying digital methods, and computer scientists linking to new methodological achievements in their field. However, this alliance can express itself in very different forms of national and international organisation, and is far from following a specific model.This panel examines different ways of "forming a community" among digital humanities scholars and scholars in other fields, and other actors in DH. The contributions span a range from generic ways to design digital research infrastructures in the SSH, over national solutions to supranational coordination.The purpose of this panel is to unfold the diversity of the current "digital humanist movement”, not only to compare, but also to understand what is at stake for the actors involved and what impact the different forms of organisation have on creation and evolution of research communities. We further discuss issues of cohesion and durability. Through the papers presented, we will examine the impact of bottom-up, top-down and horizontal strategies as well as the adoption of hybrid solutions (organizational, disciplinary, methodological, scalar) in the design of research communities. This approach will allow us to put convergences and challenges into perspective and to question the re- compositions at work within SSH communities.This panel will highlight the experiences of SSH research communities from different cultures and organizations rooted at different levels of governance, such as some French communities structured around institutional nodes such as Maisons des Sciences de l'Homme (MSH), or research infrastructures at the national (TGIR Huma-Num) or European level (DARIAH ERIC); project based collaboration of research infrastructures (DANS, The Netherlands) and Canada (CRIHN); and professional networks and transnational associations related to digital humanities (e.g. Humanistica, the French-speaking association of digital humanities, or the Latin American network for digital humanities under construction). The comparison of the experiences presented will not produce a homogeneous and smooth image but will highlight differences in approaches and organisation. Even it seems nearly impossible to give account of every association that could be representative on a way to build community in DH, the chair of the session will make an introduction with a brief summary of this landscape. That said, besides the geographical aspect that we try to include, another is that we are giving voice to formal and informal associations such as the LatamHD network, that is just at an early stage and that is not yet defined in its goals. We decided to propose several solutions to deal with the diversity of needs and practises inside our communities and we wanted to present some of them to share our experiences and initiate discussions during this panel in order to develop collaborations with colleagues sharing the same kind of constraints.Thus, the objective is to have a broad discussion with the audience to broaden the perspectives to other experiences.This panel aims to contribute to the reflective work in the wider DH context about factors of constitution, consolidation and evolution of its research communities.

  • Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Baude, Olivier; Joffres, Adeline; Larrousse, Nicolas; Pouyllau, Stéphane;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience

  • Publication . Part of book or chapter of book . Conference object . 2012
    Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Sophie Duchesne; Guillaume Garcia;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: ANR | REANALYSE (ANR-10-BLAN-1813)

    Ce texte rend compte du projet de construction d'une banque d'enquêtes qualitatives mis en œuvre par les auteurs avec l'équipe qualitative du Centre de données sociopolitiques (UMS NRS/Sciences Po). Il relate les tensions entre les logiques patrimoniale et scientifique que combine le projet et prend position pour l'usage scientifique de cet équipement. Il souligne la difficulté de construire un équipement pérenne à une période où la recherche est essentiellement financée par contrat et appel à projets.

  • Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Alès, Catherine; Arena, Richard; Brandt-Grau, Astrid; Chaabane, Naceur; Cortes, Geneviève; Crespin, Renaud; Fretel, Julien; Gardey, Delphine; Guermeur, Ivan; Gueye, Lamine; +11 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
  • English
    Authors: 
    Buddenbohm, Stefan; de Jong, Maaike; Minel, Jean-Luc; Priddy, Mike; Larousse, Nicolas; Moranville, Yoann;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | HaS-DARIAH (675570)

    The Data Deposit Recommendation Service (DDRS) intends to help the user to identify suitable research data repositories depending on case-specific requirements. As an added value service, the DDRS offers the initiation of the ingest and communication process between user and repository by forwarding a deposit request along with a structured description of the research data to the appropriate point of contact.About the nature of this document: This deliverable follows the report "Deliverable 7.1 State of the Art Report on Open Access Research Data for the Humanities" in the Humanities at Scale (HaS) work package 7 “Open Data Infrastructure”. It forms the concept for the "D 7.3 Open Data in the Humanities Platform" and prepares the implementation of the service. The Open Data Platform has been refined to a Data Deposit Recommendation Service (DDRS). The reasoning behind this process and the concept for the service are described in this document.

  • Open Access French
    Authors: 
    Olivier Ertzscheid; gabriel gallezot; Brigitte Simonnot;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    Dans un contexte de sociétés marquées par un procès d'informationnalisation et de circulation croissante et accélérée des flux d'information édités ou non, autant dans la sphère privative, dans celle du travail que dans l'espace public, le web est devenu une source pour les chercheurs en sciences humaines et sociales. La pluralité des formes du web, sa profondeur et sa dimension dynamique exigent une réflexion sur la notion de " documents " notamment lorsqu'il s'agit de constituer des corpus pour les chercheurs. Les auteurs interrogent ces conditions de constitution et de recueil des mémoires observables et de leurs dispositifs d'engrammation, le passage du document aux traces numériques, dans leurs dimensions épistémologiques, pragmatiques, éthiques et sociétales. In our societies marked by a process of informationnalisation and increasing circulation and accelerated flow of information, edited or not, in the private sphere, in the working sphere or in public space, the web has become a source for researchers in the humanities and social sciences. The plurality of forms on the web, its depth and its dynamics require reflection on the concept of "document" especially when it comes to form corpus for researchers. The authors question the conditions for the establishment and collection of observable memories and their engrammation devices, the transition from document to digital traces, in their epistemological, pragmatic, ethical and societal dimensions.

  • Open Access English
    Authors: 
    Stefan Buddenbohm; Maaike A. de Jong; Jean-Luc Minel; Yoann Moranville;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | HaS-DARIAH (675570)

    AbstractHow can researchers identify suitable research data repositories for the deposit of their research data? Which repository matches best the technical and legal requirements of a specific research project? For this end and with a humanities perspective the Data Deposit Recommendation Service (DDRS) has been developed as a prototype. It not only serves as a functional service for selecting humanities research data repositories but it is particularly a technical demonstrator illustrating the potential of re-using an already existing infrastructure - in this case re3data - and the feasibility to set up this kind of service for other research disciplines. The documentation and the code of this project can be found in the DARIAH GitHub repository: https://dariah-eric.github.io/ddrs/.

  • English
    Authors: 
    Stefan Buddenbohm; Cretin, Nathanael; Dijk, Elly; Gaiffe, Bertrand; Jong, Maaike; Le Tellier-Becquart, Nathalie; Minel, Jean-Luc;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: EC | HaS-DARIAH (675570)

    Publishing research data as open data is not yet common practice for researchers in the arts and humanities, and lags behind other scientific fields, such as the natural sciences. Moreover, even when humanities researchers publish their data in repositories and archives, these data are often hard to find and use by other researchers in the field. This report gives an overview of the various aspects that are connected to open access publishing of research data in the humanities. After the introduction, where we give definitions of key concepts, we describe the research data life cycle. We present an overview of the different stakeholders involved and we look into advantages and obstacles for researchers to share research data. Furthermore, a description of the European data repositories is given, followed by certification standards of trusted digital data repositories. The possibility of data citation is important for sharing open data and is also described in this report. We also discuss the standards and use of metadata in the humanities. Finally, we discuss best practice example of open access research data system in the humanities: the French open research data ecosystem. With this report we provide information and guidance on open access publishing of humanities research data for researchers. It will also serve as input for the design and implementation of an open humanities data platform in DARIAH.