Advanced search in Research products
Research products
arrow_drop_down
Searching FieldsTerms
Any field
arrow_drop_down
includes
arrow_drop_down
Include:
The following results are related to DARIAH EU. Are you interested to view more results? Visit OpenAIRE - Explore.
5 Research products, page 1 of 1

  • DARIAH EU
  • Publications
  • Other research products
  • 2017-2021
  • AT
  • CA
  • Mémoires en Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication
  • DARIAH EU

Relevance
arrow_drop_down
  • Polish
    Authors: 
    Costis, Dallas; Chatzidiakou, Nephelie; Maryl, Maciej; Benardou, Agiatis; Clivaz, Claire; Cunningham, John; Dabek, Meredith; Garrido, Patricia; Gonzalez-Blanco, Elena; Hadalin, Jurij; +19 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    Najważniejsze wyniki europejskiego sondażu praktyk badawczych oraz potrzeb cyfrowych w humanistyce i naukach o sztuce, przeprowadzonego przez grupę roboczą DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory (DiMPO). Badanie jest efektem współpracy europejskich badaczy z różnych krajów w ramach Grupy Roboczej DiMPO. Badanie zostało pomyślana jako ponadregionalny sondaż podłużny, przeprowadzany co kilka lat online w krajach europejskich. Jego celem jest dostarczenie opartego na danych przeglądu praktyk badawczych, potrzeb i postaw europejskich badaczy z nauk humanistycznych wobec zasobów cyfrowych, metod i narzędzi, w perspektywie przestrzennej i czasowej. Wyniki pierwszego sondażu (zakończonego w marcu 2015) zostaną zaprezentowane w wieloautorskim raporcie, który zawiera analizy zbiorcze i porównawcze oraz pięć raportów narodowych. Kolejne badanie planowane jest na 2017-2018. Więcej informacji: bit.ly/scholarlypracticesPrzekład na polski: Maciej Maryl (Centrum Humanistyki Cyfrowej Instytutu Badań Literackich PAN)

  • French
    Authors: 
    Schöpfel, Joachim;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France
    Project: SSHRC

    The study aims to contribute to the implementation of the open science ecosystem in the field of a university campus. Conducted in interviews with 51 researchers, doctoral students, laboratory managers, project managers and data engineers, the study has three objectives: (Re) Put teachers-researchers at the heart of the implementation of the ecosystem of open science, identify opportunities and locks for a data policy, and determine a framework for developing the data culture on campus.Conducted as an audit on the SHS campus of the University of Lille, the study has a pragmatic scope: to identify the essential elements for a consistent policy for the production, management and reuse of research data on a campus in the humanities and social sciences, and thus contribute to the appropriation of the concept of open science. It leads to ten recommendations for the implementation of a data policy on an SHS campus:1. Set up a scientific steering2. Invest in a targeted way3. Aim projects, not laboratories4. Use management plans as leverage5. Provide answers to security constraints6. Provide answers to communication needs7. Provide answers to curation needs8. Propose several solutions for data storage9. Institutionalize the link with the TGIR Huma-Num10. Support good practices; L'étude souhaite contribuer à la mise en œuvre de l’écosystème de la science ouverte sur le terrain d’un campus universitaire. Conduite sous forme d’entretiens avec 51 chercheurs, doctorants, responsables de laboratoires, chefs de projets et ingénieurs en charge de données, l’étude poursuit trois objectifs : (Re)Mettre les enseignants-chercheurs au cœur de la mise en œuvre de l’écosystème de la science ouverte, identifier des opportunités et verrous pour une politique de données, et déterminer un cadre pour développer la culture de données sur le campus.Menée comme un audit sur le campus SHS de l'Université de Lille, l'étude a une portée pragmatique: dégager les éléments indispensables pour une politique cohérente de la production, gestion et réutilisation des données de la recherche sur un campus en sciences humaines et sociales, et contribuer ainsi à l’appropriation du concept de la science ouverte par une « mise en culture de la donnée, qui effectue une mise en sens d’usages disséminés et spécialisés de données ouvertes ». Elle aboutit à dix recommandations pour la mise en œuvre d’une politique de données sur un campus SHS :1. Mettre en place un pilotage scientifique2. Investir d’une manière ciblée3. Viser les projets, pas les laboratoires4. Utiliser les plans de gestion comme levier5. Apporter des réponses aux contraintes de sécurité6. Apporter des réponses aux besoins de communication7. Apporter des réponses aux besoins de curation8. Proposer plusieurs solutions pour la conservation des données9. Institutionnaliser le lien avec la TGIR Huma-Num10. Soutenir les bonnes pratiques

  • English
    Authors: 
    Berra, Aurélien; Durco, Matej; Gaffield, Chad; Larrousse, Nicolas; Ribbe, Paulin; Priddy, Mike; Thiel, Carsten;
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    International audience

  • Publication . Article . Preprint . 2017
    Open Access
    Authors: 
    Jack Bowers; Laurent Romary;
    Publisher: OpenEdition
    Country: France
    Project: EC | PARTHENOS (654119), EC | PARTHENOS (654119)

    In this paper we provide a systematic and comprehensive set of modeling principles for representing etymological data in digital dictionaries using TEI. The purpose is to integrate in one coherent framework both digital representations of legacy dictionaries and born-digital lexical databases that are constructed manually or semi-automatically. We provide examples from many different types of etymological phenomena from traditional lexicographic practice, as well as analytical approaches from functional and cognitive linguistics such as metaphor, metonymy, and grammaticalization, which in many lexicographical and formal linguistic circles have not often been treated as truly etymological in nature, and have thus been largely left out of etymological dictionaries. In order to fully and accurately express the phenomena and their structures, we have made several proposals for expanding and amending some aspects of the existing TEI framework. Finally, with reference to both synchronic and diachronic data, we also demonstrate how encoders may integrate semantic web/linked open data information resources into TEI dictionaries as a basis for the sense, and/or the semantic domain, of an entry and/or an etymon.

  • Open Access German
    Authors: 
    Costis, Dallas; Chatzidiakou, Nephelie; Immenhauser, Beat; Benardou, Agiatis; Clivaz, Claire; Cunningham, John; Dabek, Meredith; Garrido, Patricia; Gonzalez-Blanco, Elena; Hadalin, Jurij; +19 more
    Publisher: HAL CCSD
    Country: France

    Die europäische Umfrage zu wissenschaftlichen Praktiken und digitalen Bedürfnissen in den Geisteswissenschaften ist das Produkt eines kollaborativen Unterfangens europäischer Forschender, die mit der DiMPOArbeitsgruppe zusammenarbeiten. Sie wurde als überregionale Längsschnittstudie konzipiert, die in einem europäischen Rahmen nach einigen Jahren jeweils wiederholt werden soll. Ziel der Studie ist es, einen evidenzbasierten Ausblick über wissenschaftliche Praktiken sowie die Bedürfnisse und Einstellungen europäischer DH-Forschender zu digitalen Ressourcen, Methoden und Werkzeuge zu geben. Die Ergebnisse der ersten Studie (März 2015 abgeschlossen) werden in einem von mehreren Autoren und Autorinnen verfassten Bericht zusammengetragen, der vergleichende und konsolidierte Analysen sowie sechs Länderprofile enthält. Eine neue Erhebung ist für 2017/18 geplant. Weitere Informationen: bit.ly/scholarlypractices Deutsche Übersetzung: Beat Immenhauser (Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften) ---------------- The highlights of the European survey on scholarly practices and digital needs in the arts and humanities carried out by DARIAH Digital Methods and Practices Observatory WG (DiMPO). This research is the outcome of collaborative work of European researchers from different countries, working within the DiMPO Working Group. It has been designed as a multiregional longitudinal survey, to be conducted online across European countries and to be repeated every few years. Its aim is to provide an evidence-based outlook of scholarly practices, needs and attitudes of European humanities researchers towards digital resources, methods and tools across space and time. Results of the first run of the survey (completed in March 2015) are presented in a multi-authored report, which includes comparative and consolidated analyses, as well as five country profiles. A new run is planned for 2017-18. For more information, see bit.ly/scholarlypractices. German translation: Beat Immenhauser (Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences)